↓ Skip to main content

Ten Simple Rules for Getting Help from Online Scientific Communities

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
twitter
125 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
329 Mendeley
citeulike
29 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten Simple Rules for Getting Help from Online Scientific Communities
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002202
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni M. Dall'Olio, Jacopo Marino, Michael Schubert, Kevin L. Keys, Melanie I. Stefan, Colin S. Gillespie, Pierre Poulain, Khader Shameer, Robert Sugar, Brandon M. Invergo, Lars J. Jensen, Jaume Bertranpetit, Hafid Laayouni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 125 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
United Kingdom 6 2%
France 6 2%
Spain 5 2%
Brazil 4 1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Russia 2 <1%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 266 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 90 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 23%
Student > Master 29 9%
Other 17 5%
Student > Postgraduate 17 5%
Other 62 19%
Unknown 39 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 46%
Computer Science 26 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Chemistry 10 3%
Other 55 17%
Unknown 52 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2023.
All research outputs
#375,636
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#256
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,324
of 144,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#2
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.