↓ Skip to main content

HIF-1 and SKN-1 Coordinate the Transcriptional Response to Hydrogen Sulfide in Caenorhabditis elegans

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
HIF-1 and SKN-1 Coordinate the Transcriptional Response to Hydrogen Sulfide in Caenorhabditis elegans
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025476
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana L. Miller, Mark W. Budde, Mark B. Roth

Abstract

Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) has dramatic physiological effects on animals that are associated with improved survival. C. elegans grown in H₂S are long-lived and thermotolerant. To identify mechanisms by which adaptation to H₂S effects physiological functions, we have measured transcriptional responses to H₂S exposure. Using microarray analysis we observe rapid changes in the abundance of specific mRNAs. The number and magnitude of transcriptional changes increased with the duration of H₂S exposure. Functional annotation suggests that genes associated with protein homeostasis are upregulated upon prolonged exposure to H₂S. Previous work has shown that the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor, HIF-1, is required for survival in H₂S. In fact, we show that hif-1 is required for most, if not all, early transcriptional changes in H₂S. Moreover, our data demonstrate that SKN-1, the C. elegans homologue of NRF2, also contributes to H₂S-dependent changes in transcription. We show that these results are functionally important, as skn-1 is essential to survive exposure to H₂S. Our results suggest a model in which HIF-1 and SKN-1 coordinate a broad transcriptional response to H₂S that culminates in a global reorganization of protein homeostasis networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 9%
South Africa 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Unknown 64 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 18 24%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 19%
Neuroscience 4 5%
Chemistry 4 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 10 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,858,486
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#111,607
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,626
of 131,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,458
of 2,559 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,559 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.