↓ Skip to main content

What is Novel About Novel Ecosystems: Managing Change in an Ever-Changing World

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What is Novel About Novel Ecosystems: Managing Change in an Ever-Changing World
Published in
Environmental Management, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0465-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy M. Truitt, Elise F. Granek, Matthew J. Duveneck, Kaitlin A. Goldsmith, Meredith P. Jordan, Kimberly C. Yazzie

Abstract

Influenced by natural climatic, geological, and evolutionary changes, landscapes and the ecosystems within are continuously changing. In addition to these natural pressures, anthropogenic drivers have increasingly influenced ecosystems. Whether affected by natural or anthropogenic processes, ecosystems, ecological communities, and ecosystem functioning are dynamic and can lead to "novel" or "emerging" ecosystems. Current literature identifies several definitions of these ecosystems but lacks an unambiguous definition and framework for categorizing what constitutes a novel ecosystem and for informing decisions around best management practices. Here we explore the various definitions used for novel ecosystems, present an unambiguous definition, and propose a framework for identifying the most appropriate management option. We identify and discuss three approaches for managing novel ecosystems: managing against, tolerating, and managing for these systems, and we provide real-world examples of each approach. We suggest that this framework will allow managers to make thoughtful decisions about which strategy is most appropriate for each unique situation, to determine whether the strategy is working, and to facilitate decision-making when it is time to modify the management approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 183 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 39 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 57 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 28%
Social Sciences 9 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 45 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#667
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,561
of 279,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#13
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.