↓ Skip to main content

なぜダニ類はクモガタ類の中で最も種数が多いのか?

Overview of attention for article published in Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
なぜダニ類はクモガタ類の中で最も種数が多いのか?
Published in
Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology, March 2018
DOI 10.19004/taxa.44.0_4
Authors

島野 智之

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#8,731,423
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#56
of 119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,584
of 349,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Taxa, Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Systematic Zoology
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.