↓ Skip to main content

Evolutionary Analysis of Genes for S-RNase-based Self-incompatibility Reveals S Locus Duplications in the Ancestral Rosaceae

Overview of attention for article published in The Horticulture Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evolutionary Analysis of Genes for S-RNase-based Self-incompatibility Reveals <i>S</i> Locus Duplications in the Ancestral Rosaceae
Published in
The Horticulture Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.2503/hortj.mi-060
Authors

Takuya Morimoto, Takashi Akagi, Ryutaro Tao

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 17%
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 13%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2015.
All research outputs
#23,319,379
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from The Horticulture Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,776
of 362,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Horticulture Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them