↓ Skip to main content

Phase 1 Trials of rVSV Ebola Vaccine in Africa and Europe

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
371 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
510 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phase 1 Trials of rVSV Ebola Vaccine in Africa and Europe
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, April 2015
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1502924
Pubmed ID
Authors

Selidji T Agnandji, Angela Huttner, Madeleine E Zinser, Patricia Njuguna, Christine Dahlke, José F Fernandes, Sabine Yerly, Julie-Anne Dayer, Verena Kraehling, Rahel Kasonta, Akim A Adegnika, Marcus Altfeld, Floriane Auderset, Emmanuel B Bache, Nadine Biedenkopf, Saskia Borregaard, Jessica S Brosnahan, Rebekah Burrow, Christophe Combescure, Jules Desmeules, Markus Eickmann, Sarah K Fehling, Axel Finckh, Ana Rita Goncalves, Martin P Grobusch, Jay Hooper, Alen Jambrecina, Anita L Kabwende, Gürkan Kaya, Domtila Kimani, Bertrand Lell, Barbara Lemaître, Ansgar W Lohse, Marguerite Massinga-Loembe, Alain Matthey, Benjamin Mordmüller, Anne Nolting, Caroline Ogwang, Michael Ramharter, Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit, Stefan Schmiedel, Peter Silvera, Felix R Stahl, Henry M Staines, Thomas Strecker, Hans C Stubbe, Benjamin Tsofa, Sherif Zaki, Patricia Fast, Vasee Moorthy, Laurent Kaiser, Sanjeev Krishna, Stephan Becker, Marie-Paule Kieny, Philip Bejon, Peter G Kremsner, Marylyn M Addo, Claire-Anne Siegrist

Abstract

Background The replication-competent recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV)-based vaccine expressing a Zaire ebolavirus (ZEBOV) glycoprotein was selected for rapid safety and immunogenicity testing before its use in West Africa. Methods We performed three open-label, dose-escalation phase 1 trials and one randomized, double-blind, controlled phase 1 trial to assess safety, side-effect profile, and immunogenicity of rVSV-ZEBOV at various doses in 158 healthy adults in Europe and Africa. All participants were injected with doses of vaccine ranging from 300,000 to 50 million plaque-forming units (PFU) or placebo. Results No serious vaccine-related adverse events were reported. Mild-to-moderate early-onset reactogenicity was frequent but transient (median, 1 day). Fever was observed in up to 35% of vaccinees. Vaccine viremia was detected within 3 days in 103 of 110 participants (94%) receiving 3 million PFU or more; rVSV was not detected in saliva or urine. In the second week after injection, arthritis affecting one to four joints developed in 11 of 51 participants (22%) in Geneva, with pain lasting a median of 8 days; 2 self-limited cases occurred in 40 participants (5%) in Hamburg, Germany, and Kilifi, Kenya. The virus was identified in one synovial-fluid aspirate and in skin vesicles of 2 other vaccinees, showing peripheral viral replication in the second week after immunization. ZEBOV-glycoprotein-specific antibody responses were detected in all the participants, with similar glycoprotein-binding antibody titers but significantly higher neutralizing antibody titers at higher doses. Conclusions In these studies, rVSV-ZEBOV was reactogenic but immunogenic after a single dose and warrants further evaluation for safety and efficacy. (Funded by the Wellcome Trust and others; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02283099 , NCT02287480 , and NCT02296983 ; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR201411000919191 .).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 498 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 82 16%
Student > Master 74 15%
Student > Bachelor 70 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 12%
Other 38 7%
Other 85 17%
Unknown 102 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 39 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 5%
Other 80 16%
Unknown 127 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 272. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#137,101
of 26,020,829 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#3,089
of 32,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,426
of 280,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#31
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,020,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,816 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 123.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,376 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.