↓ Skip to main content

The Role and Value of Conservation Agency Research

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Management, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Role and Value of Conservation Agency Research
Published in
Environmental Management, April 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00267-015-0473-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk J. Roux, Richard T. Kingsford, Stephen F. McCool, Melodie A. McGeoch, Llewellyn C. Foxcroft

Abstract

Governments charge their conservation agencies to safeguard biodiversity through protected areas and threat mitigation. Increasingly, conservation management and policy need to be supported by rigorous evidence provided by science. As such, institutional arrangements should consider and enable effective scientific research and information dissemination. What role can in-house agency research play in responding to this challenge? We examined the research capabilities of three conservation agencies from Australia, South Africa, and United States. Seven indicators were used to characterize the reliability and relevance of agency research. We found similarities among agencies in their patterns of peer-reviewed publication, cultures of research collaboration, and tendencies to align research with organizational objectives. Among the many and diverse activities that constitute the role of a contemporary agency researcher, we emphasize two key research dimensions: reliability, achieved through peer-reviewed research output, and relevance, achieved through active stakeholder engagement. Amid increasingly challenging realities for conservation of ecosystems, agency science functions are vital to providing the evidence base required for effective management and policy development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Botswana 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 26%
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 24 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Management
#1,653
of 1,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,586
of 279,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Management
#32
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.