↓ Skip to main content

Silence on the relevant literature and errors in implementation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Biotechnology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
23 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Silence on the relevant literature and errors in implementation
Published in
Nature Biotechnology, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/nbt.3185
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippe Bastiaens, Marc R Birtwistle, Nils Blüthgen, Frank J Bruggeman, Kwang-Hyun Cho, Carlo Cosentino, Alberto de la Fuente, Jan B Hoek, Anatoly Kiyatkin, Steffen Klamt, Walter Kolch, Stefan Legewie, Pedro Mendes, Takashi Naka, Tapesh Santra, Eduardo Sontag, Hans V Westerhoff, Boris N Kholodenko

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 84 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 21%
Professor 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 22%
Computer Science 5 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 16 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,488,690
of 24,903,209 outputs
Outputs from Nature Biotechnology
#2,384
of 8,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,977
of 270,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Biotechnology
#41
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,903,209 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,683 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.