You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, October 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-15-91 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher M Kramer, Jörg Barkhausen, Scott D Flamm, Raymond J Kim, Eike Nagel, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 512 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 502 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 90 | 18% |
| Researcher | 85 | 17% |
| Other | 63 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 43 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 41 | 8% |
| Other | 107 | 21% |
| Unknown | 83 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 294 | 57% |
| Engineering | 49 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 6% |
| Unknown | 105 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2021.
All research outputs
#4,740,693
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#294
of 1,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,813
of 223,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,383 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.