↓ Skip to main content

Projected Loss of a Salamander Diversity Hotspot as a Consequence of Projected Global Climate Change

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
25 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
344 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Projected Loss of a Salamander Diversity Hotspot as a Consequence of Projected Global Climate Change
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0012189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph R. Milanovich, William E. Peterman, Nathan P. Nibbelink, John C. Maerz

Abstract

Significant shifts in climate are considered a threat to plants and animals with significant physiological limitations and limited dispersal abilities. The southern Appalachian Mountains are a global hotspot for plethodontid salamander diversity. Plethodontids are lungless ectotherms, so their ecology is strongly governed by temperature and precipitation. Many plethodontid species in southern Appalachia exist in high elevation habitats that may be at or near their thermal maxima, and may also have limited dispersal abilities across warmer valley bottoms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 344 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 23 7%
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 303 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 78 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 21%
Student > Master 52 15%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Other 22 6%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 37 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 194 56%
Environmental Science 84 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 39 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 208. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#164,442
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,492
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319
of 83,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#12
of 806 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 806 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.