↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptomics of the Bed Bug (Cimex lectularius)

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
196 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transcriptomics of the Bed Bug (Cimex lectularius)
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016336
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaodong Bai, Praveen Mamidala, Swapna P. Rajarapu, Susan C. Jones, Omprakash Mittapalli

Abstract

Bed bugs (Cimex lectularius) are blood-feeding insects poised to become one of the major pests in households throughout the United States. Resistance of C. lectularius to insecticides/pesticides is one factor thought to be involved in its sudden resurgence. Despite its high-impact status, scant knowledge exists at the genomic level for C. lectularius. Hence, we subjected the C. lectularius transcriptome to 454 pyrosequencing in order to identify potential genes involved in pesticide resistance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 182 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 22%
Researcher 41 21%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Other 35 18%
Unknown 27 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 113 58%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 11%
Environmental Science 10 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 34 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,024,896
of 25,909,281 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,073
of 226,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,802
of 196,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#74
of 1,267 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,909,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,267 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.