You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid reverse genetic screening using CRISPR in zebrafish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3360 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arish N Shah, Crystal F Davey, Alex C Whitebirch, Adam C Miller, Cecilia B Moens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Turkey | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 583 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 559 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 132 | 23% |
| Researcher | 97 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 83 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 74 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 84 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 222 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 158 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 40 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 6% |
| Unknown | 88 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,571,901
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#2,514
of 5,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,773
of 281,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#51
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.