You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Better land-use allocation outperforms land sparing and land sharing approaches to conservation in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.004 |
| Authors |
Elizabeth A. Law, Erik Meijaard, Brett A. Bryan, Thilak Mallawaarachchi, Lian Pin Koh, Kerrie A. Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Chile | 1 | 5% |
| Brunei Darussalam | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 440 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 416 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 96 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 66 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 136 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 128 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 26 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 19 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 9% |
| Unknown | 77 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,890,617
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,569
of 6,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,305
of 282,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#23
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.