↓ Skip to main content

Antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section at a Ugandan hospital: a randomised clinical trial evaluating the effect of administration time on the incidence of postoperative infections

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antibiotic prophylaxis for caesarean section at a Ugandan hospital: a randomised clinical trial evaluating the effect of administration time on the incidence of postoperative infections
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0514-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lomangisi D Dlamini, Musa Sekikubo, Janat Tumukunde, Charles Kojjo, Davidson Ocen, Agnes Wabule, Arthur Kwizera

Abstract

Prophylactic antibiotics are used to prevent postoperative infections after caesarean section. Studies have suggested that the timing of prophylaxis plays an important role. Over the years, the role of the anaesthesiologist in the administration of prophylactic antibiotics has become prominent. Therefore, there is an increasing need for anaesthesia providers to understand the rationale of antibiotic prophylaxis. We therefore sought to compare the effect of antibiotics prophylaxis within 1 hour before skin incision and after skin incision on the incidence of postoperative infections in patients undergoing caesarean section at Mulago Hospital. We conducted a single-blind randomised clinical trial conducted at Mulago Hospital evaluating 464 patients undergoing emergency caesarean section. Patients were randomly assigned a group number that allocated them to either arm of the study. They received the same prophylactic antibiotic according to their allotment, that is, either within 1 hour before skin incision or after skin incision as per current standards of practice in Mulago Hospital. They were followed up to detect infection up to 10 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was postoperative infection. The data collected were analysed with STATA version 12 using univariate and bivariate analysis. The risk of overall postoperative infection was significantly lower when prophylaxis was given within an hour before incision (RR O.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.97). We also found endometritis to be significantly reduced in the pre-incision group (RR 0.62; 95% CI 0.39-0.99; P value 0.036). Giving prophylactic antibiotics before skin incision reduces risk of postoperative infection, in particular of endometritis. Pan African Clinical Trial Registry PACTR201311000610495. Date of trial registration: 12(th) August 2013.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Rwanda 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 24%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Postgraduate 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Researcher 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 48%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 40 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2016.
All research outputs
#16,106,935
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,055
of 4,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,619
of 279,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#55
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.