↓ Skip to main content

Warming of intravenous and irrigation fluids for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
150 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
483 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Warming of intravenous and irrigation fluids for preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009891.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gillian Campbell, Phil Alderson, Andrew F Smith, Sheryl Warttig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 483 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 480 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 65 13%
Student > Bachelor 51 11%
Researcher 38 8%
Other 35 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 6%
Other 104 22%
Unknown 159 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 144 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 85 18%
Psychology 11 2%
Social Sciences 10 2%
Unspecified 9 2%
Other 50 10%
Unknown 174 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,904,564
of 25,364,603 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,076
of 11,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,981
of 279,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.