↓ Skip to main content

Arctic sea ice is an important temporal sink and means of transport for microplastic

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 22,482)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
137 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
twitter
906 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Arctic sea ice is an important temporal sink and means of transport for microplastic
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-03825-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilka Peeken, Sebastian Primpke, Birte Beyer, Julia Gütermann, Christian Katlein, Thomas Krumpen, Melanie Bergmann, Laura Hehemann, Gunnar Gerdts

Abstract

Microplastics (MP) are recognized as a growing environmental hazard and have been identified as far as the remote Polar Regions, with particularly high concentrations of microplastics in sea ice. Little is known regarding the horizontal variability of MP within sea ice and how the underlying water body affects MP composition during sea ice growth. Here we show that sea ice MP has no uniform polymer composition and that, depending on the growth region and drift paths of the sea ice, unique MP patterns can be observed in different sea ice horizons. Thus even in remote regions such as the Arctic Ocean, certain MP indicate the presence of localized sources. Increasing exploitation of Arctic resources will likely lead to a higher MP load in the Arctic sea ice and will enhance the release of MP in the areas of strong seasonal sea ice melt and the outflow gateways.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 906 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 220 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 20%
Researcher 41 19%
Student > Master 37 17%
Unspecified 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Other 45 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 70 32%
Unspecified 42 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 11%
Chemistry 9 4%
Other 33 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1693. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,062
of 12,985,843 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#9
of 22,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63
of 268,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,985,843 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.