↓ Skip to main content

Some extended psychological benefits of challenging social stereotypes: Decreased dehumanization and a reduced reliance on heuristic thinking

Overview of attention for article published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Some extended psychological benefits of challenging social stereotypes: Decreased dehumanization and a reduced reliance on heuristic thinking
Published in
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, February 2015
DOI 10.1177/1368430214567762
Authors

Francesca Prati, Milica Vasiljevic, Richard J. Crisp, Monica Rubini

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 77 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 25%
Student > Bachelor 14 17%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Lecturer 6 7%
Other 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 64%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Unspecified 9 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Philosophy 2 2%
Other 5 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#1,185,677
of 13,702,549 outputs
Outputs from Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
#96
of 485 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,958
of 183,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,702,549 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 485 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.