↓ Skip to main content

Plant sterols: factors affecting their efficacy and safety as functional food ingredients

Overview of attention for article published in Lipids in Health and Disease, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
263 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
239 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant sterols: factors affecting their efficacy and safety as functional food ingredients
Published in
Lipids in Health and Disease, April 2004
DOI 10.1186/1476-511x-3-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alvin Berger, Peter JH Jones, Suhad S Abumweis

Abstract

Plant sterols are naturally occurring molecules that humanity has evolved with. Herein, we have critically evaluated recent literature pertaining to the myriad of factors affecting efficacy and safety of plant sterols in free and esterified forms. We conclude that properly solubilized 4-desmetyl plant sterols, in ester or free form, in reasonable doses (0.8-1.0 g of equivalents per day) and in various vehicles including natural sources, and as part of a healthy diet and lifestyle, are important dietary components for lowering low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and maintaining good heart health. In addition to their cholesterol lowering properties, plant sterols possess anti-cancer, anti-inflammatory, anti-atherogenicity, and anti-oxidation activities, and should thus be of clinical importance, even for those individuals without elevated LDL cholesterol. The carotenoid lowering effect of plant sterols should be corrected by increasing intake of food that is rich in carotenoids. In pregnant and lactating women and children, further study is needed to verify the dose required to decrease blood cholesterol without affecting fat-soluble vitamins and carotenoid status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 239 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 234 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 57 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Chemistry 19 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 72 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,929,769
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Lipids in Health and Disease
#429
of 1,608 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,651
of 62,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lipids in Health and Disease
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,608 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them