↓ Skip to main content

Microremains from El Mirón Cave human dental calculus suggest a mixed plant–animal subsistence economy during the Magdalenian in Northern Iberia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Archaeological Science, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Microremains from El Mirón Cave human dental calculus suggest a mixed plant–animal subsistence economy during the Magdalenian in Northern Iberia
Published in
Journal of Archaeological Science, August 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jas.2015.04.003
Authors

Robert C. Power, Domingo C. Salazar-García, Lawrence G. Straus, Manuel R. González Morales, Amanda G. Henry

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 24%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 17 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Social Sciences 9 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 7%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 16 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#407,431
of 15,397,108 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#119
of 2,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,800
of 230,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,397,108 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.