↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 From Selective Full-Length Genes Isolation by TAR Cloning in Yeast to Their Expression from HAC Vectors in Human Cells.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Recombineering Linear BACs.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 BAC Sequencing Using Pooled Methods.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Making BAC Transgene Constructs with Lambda-Red Recombineering System for Transgenic Animals or Cell Lines.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Directing Enhancer-Traps and iTol2 End-Sequences to Deleted BAC Ends with loxP- and lox511-Tn10 Transposons.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Recombining Overlapping BACs into Single Large BACs
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Generation of Knockout Alleles by RFLP Based BAC Targeting of Polymorphic Embryonic Stem Cells
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Herpesvirus Mutagenesis Facilitated by Infectious Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes (iBACs)
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Conversion of BAC Clones into Binary BAC (BIBAC) Vectors and Their Delivery into Basidiomycete Fungal Cells Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Infectious Delivery of Alphaherpesvirus Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 A recombineering-based gene tagging system for Arabidopsis.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 BAC Transgenic Zebrafish for Transcriptional Promoter and Enhancer Studies
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 BACs-on-Beads™ (BoBs™) Assay for the Genetic Evaluation of Prenatal Samples and Products of Conception.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 New BAC Probe Set to Narrow Down Chromosomal Breakpoints in Small and Large Derivative Chromosomes, Especially Suited for Mosaic Conditions
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 BAC-Probes Applied for Characterization of Fragile Sites (FS)
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Application of BAC-Probes to Visualize Copy Number Variants (CNVs)
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Site-specific Integration of Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes into Human Cells
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Generation of BAC Reporter Cell Lines for Drug Discovery
Attention for Chapter 13: BACs-on-Beads™ (BoBs™) Assay for the Genetic Evaluation of Prenatal Samples and Products of Conception.
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
BACs-on-Beads™ (BoBs™) Assay for the Genetic Evaluation of Prenatal Samples and Products of Conception.
Chapter number 13
Book title
Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/978-1-4939-1652-8_13
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-4939-1651-1, 978-1-4939-1652-8
Authors

Grati FR, Vialard F, Gross S, Francesca Romana Grati, François Vialard, Susan Gross, Grati, Francesca Romana, Vialard, François, Gross, Susan

Abstract

BACs-on-Beads™ (BoBs™) is a new emerging technology, a modification of comparative genomic hybridization that can be used to detect DNA copy number gains and losses. Here, we describe the application of two different types of BoBs™ assays: (1) Prenatal BoBs (CE-IVD) to detect the most frequent syndromes associated with chromosome microdeletions, as well as the trisomy 13, 18 and 21, and (2) KaryoLite BoBs (RUO) which can detect aneuploidy in all chromosomes by quantifying proximal and terminal regions of each chromosomal arm. The interpretation of the results by BoBsoft™ software is also described. Although BoBs™ may not have the breadth and scope to replace chromosomal microarrays (array comparative genomic hybridization and single nucleotide polymorphism array) in the prenatal setting, particularly when a fetal anomaly has been detected, it is a well suited alternative for FISH or QF-PCR because BoBs™ is comparable, if not superior in terms of cost, turnaround time (TAT) and throughput and accuracy. BoBs™ also has the ability to detect significant fetal mosaicism (≥30 % with Prenatal BoBs and ≥50 % with KaryoLite BoBs). However, perhaps the greatest strength of this new technology is the fact that unlike FISH or QF-PCR, it has the ability to detect common microdeletion syndromes or additional aneuploidies, both of which may be easily missed despite excellent prenatal sonography. Thus, when BoBs™ is applied in the correct clinical setting and run and analyzed in appropriate laboratories this technique can improve and augment best practices with a personalization of prenatal care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 27%
Researcher 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2014.
All research outputs
#14,201,088
of 22,764,165 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#4,174
of 13,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,231
of 252,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#24
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,764,165 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.