↓ Skip to main content

Activity-specific ecological niche models for planning reintroductions of California condors ( Gymnogyps californianus )

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Activity-specific ecological niche models for planning reintroductions of California condors ( Gymnogyps californianus )
Published in
Biological Conservation, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.002
Authors

Jesse D’Elia, Susan M. Haig, Matthew Johnson, Bruce G. Marcot, Richard Young

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Unknown 94 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 17%
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Other 3 3%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 43%
Environmental Science 25 26%
Unspecified 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 21 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,718,063
of 12,641,591 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,524
of 3,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,599
of 225,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#45
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,641,591 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,686 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.