Quality ratings of reviews in overviews: a comparison of reviews with and without dual (co-)authorship

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, April 2018

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

So far, Altmetric has seen 49 X posts from 49 X users, with an upper bound of 242,622 followers.

"Authors of overviews of #SystematicReviews give higher quality ratings to SRs in which they were involved themselves than to other SRs" - Interesting @BioMedCentral report on #DualCoAuthorship as a conflict of interest and source of #bias https://t.co/4qU

RT @hildabast: Important thorny issue raised: systematic reviewers who did reviews of reviews rated their own reviews more highly than thos…

RT @hildabast: Important thorny issue raised: systematic reviewers who did reviews of reviews rated their own reviews more highly than thos…

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 45 additional X posts.