↓ Skip to main content

Impaired Striatal Akt Signaling Disrupts Dopamine Homeostasis and Increases Feeding

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impaired Striatal Akt Signaling Disrupts Dopamine Homeostasis and Increases Feeding
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025169
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicole Speed, Christine Saunders, Adeola R. Davis, W. Anthony Owens, Heinrich J. G. Matthies, Sanaz Saadat, Jack P. Kennedy, Roxanne A. Vaughan, Rachael L. Neve, Craig W. Lindsley, Scott J. Russo, Lynette C. Daws, Kevin D. Niswender1, Aurelio Galli

Abstract

The prevalence of obesity has increased dramatically worldwide. The obesity epidemic begs for novel concepts and therapeutic targets that cohesively address "food-abuse" disorders. We demonstrate a molecular link between impairment of a central kinase (Akt) involved in insulin signaling induced by exposure to a high-fat (HF) diet and dysregulation of higher order circuitry involved in feeding. Dopamine (DA) rich brain structures, such as striatum, provide motivation stimuli for feeding. In these central circuitries, DA dysfunction is posited to contribute to obesity pathogenesis. We identified a mechanistic link between metabolic dysregulation and the maladaptive behaviors that potentiate weight gain. Insulin, a hormone in the periphery, also acts centrally to regulate both homeostatic and reward-based HF feeding. It regulates DA homeostasis, in part, by controlling a key element in DA clearance, the DA transporter (DAT). Upon HF feeding, nigro-striatal neurons rapidly develop insulin signaling deficiencies, causing increased HF calorie intake.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 30%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 24%
Neuroscience 20 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,236,094
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,679
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,436
of 131,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,661
of 2,559 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,738 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,559 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.