↓ Skip to main content

Bee Threat Elicits Alarm Call in African Elephants

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
63 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
242 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bee Threat Elicits Alarm Call in African Elephants
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0010346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy E. King, Joseph Soltis, Iain Douglas-Hamilton, Anne Savage, Fritz Vollrath

Abstract

Unlike the smaller and more vulnerable mammals, African elephants have relatively few predators that threaten their survival. The sound of disturbed African honeybees Apis meliffera scutellata causes African elephants Loxodonta africana to retreat and produce warning vocalizations that lead other elephants to join the flight. In our first experiment, audio playbacks of bee sounds induced elephants to retreat and elicited more head-shaking and dusting, reactive behaviors that may prevent bee stings, compared to white noise control playbacks. Most importantly, elephants produced distinctive "rumble" vocalizations in response to bee sounds. These rumbles exhibited an upward shift in the second formant location, which implies active vocal tract modulation, compared to rumbles made in response to white noise playbacks. In a second experiment, audio playbacks of these rumbles produced in response to bees elicited increased headshaking, and further and faster retreat behavior in other elephants, compared to control rumble playbacks with lower second formant frequencies. These responses to the bee rumble stimuli occurred in the absence of any bees or bee sounds. This suggests that these elephant rumbles may function as referential signals, in which a formant frequency shift alerts nearby elephants about an external threat, in this case, the threat of bees.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 2%
India 4 2%
Brazil 3 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 6 2%
Unknown 216 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 18%
Student > Master 37 15%
Student > Bachelor 32 13%
Other 19 8%
Other 36 15%
Unknown 28 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 98 40%
Environmental Science 59 24%
Psychology 17 7%
Engineering 8 3%
Computer Science 6 2%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 35 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2021.
All research outputs
#361,279
of 25,320,147 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,128
of 219,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#922
of 102,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#19
of 704 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,320,147 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,660 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 704 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.