Title |
Novel pantothenate derivatives for anti-malarial chemotherapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12936-015-0673-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Helmi E Pett, Patrick AM Jansen, Pedro HH Hermkens, Peter NM Botman, Christien A Beuckens-Schortinghuis, Richard H Blaauw, Wouter Graumans, Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer, Karin MJ Koolen, Floris PJT Rutjes, Koen J Dechering, Robert W Sauerwein, Joost Schalkwijk |
Abstract |
A number of synthetic pantothenate derivatives, such as pantothenamides, are known to inhibit the growth of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum, by interfering with the parasite Coenzyme A (CoA) biosynthetic pathway. The clinical use of pantothenamides is limited by their sensitivity to breakdown by ubiquitous human pantetheinases of the vanin family. A number of pantothenate derivatives (pantothenones) with potent and specific inhibitory activity against mammalian vanins were tested in a proliferation assay of asexual P. falciparum blood stages alone, and in combination with pantothenamides. The vanin inhibitors were found to protect pantothenamides against breakdown by plasma vanins, thereby preserving the in vitro anti-malarial activity. Moreover, some of the vanin inhibitors showed in vitro anti-malarial activity in the low micromolar range. The most potent antimalarial in this series of compounds (RR8), was found to compete with pantothenate in a combination proliferation assay. No correlation, however, was found between anti-vanin and anti-malarial activity, nor was pantetheinase activity detected in P. falciparum extracts. Growth inhibition is most likely due to competition with pantothenate, rather than pantetheinase inhibition. As vanin inhibitors of the pantothenone class are stable in biological fluids and are non-toxic to mammalian cells, they may represent novel pantothenate-based anti-malarials, either on their own or in combination with pantothenamides. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 24% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 24% |
Unknown | 4 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 30% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 27% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
Chemistry | 2 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 6 | 18% |