↓ Skip to main content

LUBAC is essential for embryogenesis by preventing cell death and enabling haematopoiesis

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
174 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
LUBAC is essential for embryogenesis by preventing cell death and enabling haematopoiesis
Published in
Nature, April 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41586-018-0064-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nieves Peltzer, Maurice Darding, Antonella Montinaro, Peter Draber, Helena Draberova, Sebastian Kupka, Eva Rieser, Amanda Fisher, Ciaran Hutchinson, Lucia Taraborrelli, Torsten Hartwig, Elodie Lafont, Tobias L. Haas, Yutaka Shimizu, Charlotta Böiers, Aida Sarr, James Rickard, Silvia Alvarez-Diaz, Michael T. Ashworth, Allison Beal, Tariq Enver, John Bertin, William Kaiser, Andreas Strasser, John Silke, Philippe Bouillet, Henning Walczak

Abstract

The linear ubiquitin chain assembly complex (LUBAC) is required for optimal gene activation and prevention of cell death upon activation of immune receptors, including TNFR1 1 . Deficiency in the LUBAC components SHARPIN or HOIP in mice results in severe inflammation in adulthood or embryonic lethality, respectively, owing to deregulation of TNFR1-mediated cell death2-8. In humans, deficiency in the third LUBAC component HOIL-1 causes autoimmunity and inflammatory disease, similar to HOIP deficiency, whereas HOIL-1 deficiency in mice was reported to cause no overt phenotype9-11. Here we show, by creating HOIL-1-deficient mice, that HOIL-1 is as essential for LUBAC function as HOIP, albeit for different reasons: whereas HOIP is the catalytically active component of LUBAC, HOIL-1 is required for LUBAC assembly, stability and optimal retention in the TNFR1 signalling complex, thereby preventing aberrant cell death. Both HOIL-1 and HOIP prevent embryonic lethality at mid-gestation by interfering with aberrant TNFR1-mediated endothelial cell death, which only partially depends on RIPK1 kinase activity. Co-deletion of caspase-8 with RIPK3 or MLKL prevents cell death in Hoil-1-/- (also known as Rbck1-/-) embryos, yet only the combined loss of caspase-8 with MLKL results in viable HOIL-1-deficient mice. Notably, triple-knockout Ripk3-/-Casp8-/-Hoil-1-/- embryos die at late gestation owing to haematopoietic defects that are rescued by co-deletion of RIPK1 but not MLKL. Collectively, these results demonstrate that both HOIP and HOIL-1 are essential LUBAC components and are required for embryogenesis by preventing aberrant cell death. Furthermore, they reveal that when LUBAC and caspase-8 are absent, RIPK3 prevents RIPK1 from inducing embryonic lethality by causing defects in fetal haematopoiesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 20%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 39 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 42 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,237,020
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#35,201
of 98,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,649
of 340,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#672
of 898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.