↓ Skip to main content

Genome instability syndromes caused by impaired DNA repair and aberrant DNA damage responses

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biology and Toxicology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome instability syndromes caused by impaired DNA repair and aberrant DNA damage responses
Published in
Cell Biology and Toxicology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10565-018-9429-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Terabayashi, Katsuhiro Hanada

Abstract

Maintenance of genome integrity is essential for all organisms because genome information regulates cell proliferation, growth arrest, and vital metabolic processes in cells, tissues, organs, and organisms. Because genomes are constantly exposed to intrinsic and extrinsic genotoxic stress, cellular DNA repair machinery and proper DNA damage responses (DDR) have evolved to quickly eliminate genotoxic DNA lesions, thus maintaining the genome integrity suitably. In human, germline mutations in genes involved not only in cellular DNA repair pathways but also in cellular DDR machinery frequently predispose hereditary diseases associated with chromosome aberrations. These genetic syndromes typically displaying mutations in DNA repair/DDR-related genes are often called "genome instability syndromes." Common features of these hereditary syndromes include a high incidence of cancers and developmental abnormalities including short stature, microcephaly, and/or neurological deficiencies. However, precisely how impaired DNA repair and/or dysfunctional DDR pathologically promote(s) these syndromes are poorly understood. In this review article, we summarize the clinical symptoms of several representatives "genome instability syndromes" and propose the plausible pathogenesis thereof.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 22 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 14%
Neuroscience 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 24 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,506,823
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#291
of 486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,241
of 329,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biology and Toxicology
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 486 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.