↓ Skip to main content

The role of random nanostructures for the omnidirectional anti-reflection properties of the glasswing butterfly

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
96 X users
facebook
14 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
30 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
258 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
314 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The role of random nanostructures for the omnidirectional anti-reflection properties of the glasswing butterfly
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Radwanul Hasan Siddique, Guillaume Gomard, Hendrik Hölscher

Abstract

The glasswing butterfly (Greta oto) has, as its name suggests, transparent wings with remarkable low haze and reflectance over the whole visible spectral range even for large view angles of 80°. This omnidirectional anti-reflection behaviour is caused by small nanopillars covering the transparent regions of its wings. In difference to other anti-reflection coatings found in nature, these pillars are irregularly arranged and feature a random height and width distribution. Here we simulate the optical properties with the effective medium theory and transfer matrix method and show that the random height distribution of pillars significantly reduces the reflection not only for normal incidence but also for high view angles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 96 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 314 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 308 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 79 25%
Researcher 49 16%
Student > Master 29 9%
Student > Bachelor 26 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 6%
Other 42 13%
Unknown 71 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 54 17%
Engineering 50 16%
Physics and Astronomy 40 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 6%
Chemistry 20 6%
Other 40 13%
Unknown 90 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 289. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2023.
All research outputs
#124,536
of 25,813,008 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#1,787
of 58,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,234
of 281,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#12
of 746 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,813,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,562 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 746 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.