↓ Skip to main content

Testing the assumptions of the pyrodiversity begets biodiversity hypothesis for termites in semi-arid Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Royal Society Open Science, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testing the assumptions of the pyrodiversity begets biodiversity hypothesis for termites in semi-arid Australia
Published in
Royal Society Open Science, April 2018
DOI 10.1098/rsos.172055
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayley Davis, Euan G. Ritchie, Sarah Avitabile, Tim Doherty, Dale G. Nimmo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 31%
Environmental Science 16 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 18 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,169,199
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Royal Society Open Science
#1,556
of 4,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,513
of 340,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Royal Society Open Science
#67
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.