↓ Skip to main content

Direct neuronal glucose uptake heralds activity-dependent increases in cerebral metabolism

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Direct neuronal glucose uptake heralds activity-dependent increases in cerebral metabolism
Published in
Nature Communications, April 2015
DOI 10.1038/ncomms7807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iben Lundgaard, Baoman Li, Lulu Xie, Hongyi Kang, Simon Sanggaard, John D. R. Haswell, Wei Sun, Siri Goldman, Solomiya Blekot, Michael Nielsen, Takahiro Takano, Rashid Deane, Maiken Nedergaard

Abstract

Metabolically, the brain is a highly active organ that relies almost exclusively on glucose as its energy source. According to the astrocyte-to-neuron lactate shuttle hypothesis, glucose is taken up by astrocytes and converted to lactate, which is then oxidized by neurons. Here we show, using two-photon imaging of a near-infrared 2-deoxyglucose analogue (2DG-IR), that glucose is taken up preferentially by neurons in awake behaving mice. Anaesthesia suppressed neuronal 2DG-IR uptake and sensory stimulation was associated with a sharp increase in neuronal, but not astrocytic, 2DG-IR uptake. Moreover, hexokinase, which catalyses the first enzymatic steps in glycolysis, was highly enriched in neurons compared with astrocytes, in mouse as well as in human cortex. These observations suggest that brain activity and neuronal glucose metabolism are directly linked, and identiy the neuron as the principal locus of glucose uptake as visualized by functional brain imaging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 390 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 87 22%
Researcher 62 16%
Student > Master 42 11%
Student > Bachelor 38 10%
Professor 22 6%
Other 69 17%
Unknown 78 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 110 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 45 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 10%
Psychology 11 3%
Other 33 8%
Unknown 89 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#627,509
of 22,800,560 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#10,955
of 46,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,329
of 265,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#113
of 745 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,800,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 46,931 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 745 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.