↓ Skip to main content

MORPH: Probabilistic Alignment Combined with Hidden Markov Models of cis-Regulatory Modules

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
citeulike
11 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MORPH: Probabilistic Alignment Combined with Hidden Markov Models of cis-Regulatory Modules
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, November 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saurabh Sinha, Xin He

Abstract

The discovery and analysis of cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) in metazoan genomes is crucial for understanding the transcriptional control of development and many other biological processes. Cross-species sequence comparison holds much promise for improving computational prediction of CRMs, for elucidating their binding site composition, and for understanding how they evolve. Current methods for analyzing orthologous CRMs from multiple species rely upon sequence alignments produced by off-the-shelf alignment algorithms, which do not exploit the presence of binding sites in the sequences. We present here a unified probabilistic framework, called MORPH, that integrates the alignment task with binding site predictions, allowing more robust CRM analysis in two species. The framework sums over all possible alignments of two sequences, thus accounting for alignment ambiguities in a natural way. We perform extensive tests on orthologous CRMs from two moderately diverged species Drosophila melanogaster and D. mojavensis, to demonstrate the advantages of the new approach. We show that it can overcome certain computational artifacts of traditional alignment tools and provide a different, likely more accurate, picture of cis-regulatory evolution than that obtained from existing methods. The burgeoning field of cis-regulatory evolution, which is amply supported by the availability of many related genomes, is currently thwarted by the lack of accurate alignments of regulatory regions. Our work will fill in this void and enable more reliable analysis of CRM evolution.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 11%
Spain 2 3%
France 2 3%
Unknown 54 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 14%
Student > Master 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 55%
Computer Science 12 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 10 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2011.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#6,133
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,257
of 90,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#29
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.