↓ Skip to main content

S-MART, A Software Toolbox to Aid RNA-seq Data Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
S-MART, A Software Toolbox to Aid RNA-seq Data Analysis
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Zytnicki, Hadi Quesneville

Abstract

High-throughput sequencing is now routinely performed in many experiments. But the analysis of the millions of sequences generated, is often beyond the expertise of the wet labs who have no personnel specializing in bioinformatics. Whereas several tools are now available to map high-throughput sequencing data on a genome, few of these can extract biological knowledge from the mapped reads. We have developed a toolbox called S-MART, which handles mapped RNA-Seq data. S-MART is an intuitive and lightweight tool which performs many of the tasks usually required for the analysis of mapped RNA-Seq reads. S-MART does not require any computer science background and thus can be used by all of the biologist community through a graphical interface. S-MART can run on any personal computer, yielding results within an hour even for Gb of data for most queries. S-MART may perform the entire analysis of the mapped reads, without any need for other ad hoc scripts. With this tool, biologists can easily perform most of the analyses on their computer for their RNA-Seq data, from the mapped data to the discovery of important loci.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
China 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 70 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 43%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Professor 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Computer Science 4 5%
Mathematics 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 6 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2011.
All research outputs
#19,559,900
of 24,059,832 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#166,685
of 206,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,322
of 136,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,171
of 2,639 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,059,832 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 206,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,639 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.