You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effect of the prone maximal restraint position with and without weight force on cardiac output and other hemodynamic measures
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Forensic & Legal Medicine, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.08.006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Davut J. Savaser, Colleen Campbell, Edward M. Castillo, Gary M. Vilke, Christian Sloane, Tom Neuman, Allan V. Hansen, Virag Shah, Theodore C. Chan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 9 | 18% |
Researcher | 8 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 11 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 29% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
Psychology | 3 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Other | 8 | 16% |
Unknown | 14 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,251,857
of 25,701,027 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Forensic & Legal Medicine
#60
of 1,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,588
of 212,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Forensic & Legal Medicine
#1
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,701,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,197 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.