↓ Skip to main content

Going home after Hurricane Katrina: Determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Going home after Hurricane Katrina: Determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas
Published in
Demography, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/bf03214587
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey A. Groen, Anne E. Polivka

Abstract

This article examines the decision of Hurricane Katrina evacuees to return to their pre-Katrina areas and documents how the composition of the Katrina-affected region changed over time. Using data from the Current Population Survey, we show that an evacuee's age, family income, and the severity of damage in an evacuee's county of origin are important determinants of whether an evacuee returned during the first year after the storm. Blacks were less likely to return than whites, but this difference is primarily related to the geographical pattern of storm damage rather than to race per se. The difference between the composition of evacuees who returned and the composition of evacuees who did not return is the primary force behind changes in the composition of the affected areas in the first two years after the storm. Katrina is associated with substantial shifts in the racial composition of the affected areas (namely, a decrease in the percentage of residents who are black) and an increasing presence of Hispanics. Katrina is also associated with an increase in the percentage of older residents, a decrease in the percentage of residents with low income/education, and an increase in the percentage of residents with high income/education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 3 2%
United States 3 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 172 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Student > Master 29 16%
Lecturer 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Researcher 14 8%
Other 31 17%
Unknown 38 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 44 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 17%
Environmental Science 11 6%
Engineering 11 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 4%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 49 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#608,021
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#166
of 2,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,672
of 111,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them