Title |
Implementation of a mechanical CPR device in a physician staffed HEMS – a prospective observational study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13049-018-0503-4 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Simon Rauch, Giacomo Strapazzon, Monika Brodmann, Ernst Fop, Christian Masoner, Lydia Rauch, Alessandro Forti, Urs Pietsch, Peter Mair, Hermann Brugger |
Abstract |
In this prospective, observational study we describe the incidence and characteristics of out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases who received mechanical CPR, after the implementation of a mechanical CPR device (LUCAS 2; Physio Control, Redmond, WA, USA) in a physician staffed helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) in South Tyrol, Italy. During the study period (06/2013-04/2016), 525 OHCA cases were registered by the dispatch centre, 271 (51.6%) were assisted by HEMS. LUCAS 2 was applied in 18 (6.6%) of all HEMS-assisted OHCA patients; ten were treated with LUCAS 2 at the scene only, and eight were transported to hospital with ongoing CPR. Two (11.1%) of the 18 patients survived long term with full neurologic recovery. In seven of eight patients transferred to hospital with ongoing CPR, CPR was ceased in the emergency room without further intervention. Retrospectively, all HEMS-assisted OHCA cases were screened for proposed indication criteria for prolonged CPR. Thirteen patients fulfilled these criteria, but only two of them were transported to hospital. Based on these results, we propose a standard operating procedure for HEMS-assisted patients with refractory OHCA in a region without hospitals with ECLS capacity. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 4 | 33% |
United States | 2 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 14% |
Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 14% |
Engineering | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 30% |