↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: a SNP profiling panel for sample tracking in whole-exome sequencing studies

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: a SNP profiling panel for sample tracking in whole-exome sequencing studies
Published in
Genome Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13073-015-0163-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reuben J Pengelly, Jane Gibson, Gaia Andreoletti, Andrew Collins, Christopher J Mattocks, Sarah Ennis

Abstract

This is an Erratum to Genome Medicine 2013, 5:89, highlighting an error in Table 1 of the original article. Please see related article: http://genomemedicine.com/content/5/9/89.[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/gm492.].

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 18%
Engineering 2 9%
Computer Science 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 2 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2015.
All research outputs
#12,619,431
of 16,534,657 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,037
of 1,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,507
of 233,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,534,657 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them