↓ Skip to main content

Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
318 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
988 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Published in
Science, May 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa1160
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eytan Bakshy, Solomon Messing, Lada Adamic, Lada A. Adamic, Bakshy, Eytan, Messing, Solomon, Adamic, Lada

Abstract

Exposure to news, opinion and civic information increasingly occurs through social media. How do these online networks influence exposure to perspectives that cut across ideological lines? Using de-identified data, we examined how 10.1 million U.S. Facebook users interact with socially shared news. We directly measured ideological homophily in friend networks, and examine the extent to which heterogeneous friends could potentially expose individuals to cross-cutting content. We then quantified the extent to which individuals encounter comparatively more or less diverse content while interacting via Facebook's algorithmically ranked News Feed, and further studied users' choices to click through to ideologically discordant content. Compared to algorithmic ranking, individuals' choices about what to consume had a stronger effect limiting exposure to cross-cutting content.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 737 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 988 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 25 3%
Brazil 8 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Netherlands 6 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Finland 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Other 28 3%
Unknown 892 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 290 29%
Student > Master 175 18%
Student > Bachelor 121 12%
Researcher 112 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 59 6%
Other 230 23%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 354 36%
Computer Science 156 16%
Psychology 101 10%
Unspecified 81 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 49 5%
Other 246 25%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1748. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2018.
All research outputs
#789
of 12,146,399 outputs
Outputs from Science
#56
of 54,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16
of 221,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,146,399 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.