↓ Skip to main content

Pain management for rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular or renal comorbidity

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pain management for rheumatoid arthritis and cardiovascular or renal comorbidity
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008952.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan L Marks, Alexandra N Colebatch, Rachelle Buchbinder, Christopher J Edwards

Abstract

Pain in rheumatoid arthritis is common, is often multi-factorial and many different pharmacotherapeutic agents are routinely used for pain management. There are concerns that some of the pain pharmacotherapies currently used may increase the risk of adverse events in people with rheumatoid arthritis and concurrent cardiovascular or renal disease.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 112 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Researcher 23 19%
Unspecified 18 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Other 24 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 45%
Unspecified 23 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Psychology 9 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 7%
Other 16 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,747,808
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,941
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,535
of 95,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.