↓ Skip to main content

Forensic analysis of the microbiome of phones and shoes

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 1,782)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
33 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
87 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
275 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Forensic analysis of the microbiome of phones and shoes
Published in
Microbiome, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40168-015-0082-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon Lax, Jarrad T Hampton-Marcell, Sean M Gibbons, Geórgia Barguil Colares, Daniel Smith, Jonathan A Eisen, Jack A Gilbert

Abstract

Microbial interaction between human-associated objects and the environments we inhabit may have forensic implications, and the extent to which microbes are shared between individuals inhabiting the same space may be relevant to human health and disease transmission. In this study, two participants sampled the front and back of their cell phones, four different locations on the soles of their shoes, and the floor beneath them every waking hour over a 2-day period. A further 89 participants took individual samples of their shoes and phones at three different scientific conferences. Samples taken from different surface types maintained significantly different microbial community structures. The impact of the floor microbial community on that of the shoe environments was strong and immediate, as evidenced by Procrustes analysis of shoe replicates and significant correlation between shoe and floor samples taken at the same time point. Supervised learning was highly effective at determining which participant had taken a given shoe or phone sample, and a Bayesian method was able to determine which participant had taken each shoe sample based entirely on its similarity to the floor samples. Both shoe and phone samples taken by conference participants clustered into distinct groups based on location, though much more so when an unweighted distance metric was used, suggesting sharing of low-abundance microbial taxa between individuals inhabiting the same space. Correlations between microbial community sources and sinks allow for inference of the interactions between humans and their environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 265 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 16%
Student > Bachelor 36 13%
Researcher 31 11%
Other 15 5%
Other 44 16%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Chemistry 10 4%
Other 43 16%
Unknown 60 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 382. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2023.
All research outputs
#81,929
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#26
of 1,782 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#786
of 279,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,782 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.