↓ Skip to main content

Cortical reorganization in an astronaut’s brain after long-duration spaceflight

Overview of attention for article published in Brain Structure and Function, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 2,046)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
35 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
39 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortical reorganization in an astronaut’s brain after long-duration spaceflight
Published in
Brain Structure and Function, May 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00429-015-1054-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Athena Demertzi, Angelique Van Ombergen, Elena Tomilovskaya, Ben Jeurissen, Ekaterina Pechenkova, Carol Di Perri, Liudmila Litvinova, Enrico Amico, Alena Rumshiskaya, Ilya Rukavishnikov, Jan Sijbers, Valentin Sinitsyn, Inessa B. Kozlovskaya, Stefan Sunaert, Paul M. Parizel, Paul H. Van de Heyning, Steven Laureys, Floris L. Wuyts

Abstract

To date, hampered physiological function after exposure to microgravity has been primarily attributed to deprived peripheral neuro-sensory systems. For the first time, this study elucidates alterations in human brain function after long-duration spaceflight. More specifically, we found significant differences in resting-state functional connectivity between motor cortex and cerebellum, as well as changes within the default mode network. In addition, the cosmonaut showed changes in the supplementary motor areas during a motor imagery task. These results highlight the underlying neural basis for the observed physiological deconditioning due to spaceflight and are relevant for future interplanetary missions and vestibular patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 16%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Master 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 16%
Psychology 17 10%
Engineering 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 54 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 305. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#115,154
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#4
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,129
of 280,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,009 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.