You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparativo dos softwares de gerenciamento de referências bibliográficas: Mendeley, EndNote e Zotero
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Transinformação, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0103-37862014000200006 |
| Authors |
Eduardo Kazumi Yamakawa, Flávio Issao Kubota, Fernanda Hansch Beuren, Lisiane Scalvenzi, Paulo Augusto Cauchik Miguel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 60% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 271 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 16% |
| Librarian | 26 | 9% |
| Researcher | 22 | 8% |
| Professor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 19% |
| Unknown | 64 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 41 | 15% |
| Engineering | 28 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 91 | 33% |
| Unknown | 72 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,252,935
of 25,964,892 outputs
Outputs from Transinformação
#42
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,676
of 241,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transinformação
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,964,892 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them