↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic rupture models of earthquakes on the Bartlett Springs Fault, Northern California

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic rupture models of earthquakes on the Bartlett Springs Fault, Northern California
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/2015gl063802
Authors

Julian C. Lozos, Ruth A. Harris, Jessica R. Murray, James J. Lienkaemper

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 55%
Unspecified 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Master 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 45%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 45%
Engineering 1 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2015.
All research outputs
#10,938,201
of 12,342,171 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#9,212
of 12,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,535
of 235,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#276
of 425 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,342,171 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 425 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.