↓ Skip to main content

Don't judge habitat on its novelty: Assessing the value of novel habitats for an endangered mammal in a peri-urban landscape

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
16 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Don't judge habitat on its novelty: Assessing the value of novel habitats for an endangered mammal in a peri-urban landscape
Published in
Biological Conservation, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.022
Authors

Sarah J. Maclagan, Terry Coates, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 20%
Student > Master 16 16%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 32 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 30%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 27 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2018.
All research outputs
#1,191,402
of 22,078,848 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,028
of 5,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,413
of 297,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#36
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,078,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.