↓ Skip to main content

Don't judge habitat on its novelty: Assessing the value of novel habitats for an endangered mammal in a peri-urban landscape

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
17 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Don't judge habitat on its novelty: Assessing the value of novel habitats for an endangered mammal in a peri-urban landscape
Published in
Biological Conservation, July 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.022
Authors

Sarah J. Maclagan, Terry Coates, Euan G. Ritchie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 29%
Student > Master 10 16%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Other 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 7 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 37%
Environmental Science 21 33%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Engineering 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2018.
All research outputs
#654,332
of 14,122,617 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#564
of 4,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,921
of 274,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#33
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,122,617 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.