You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Don't judge habitat on its novelty: Assessing the value of novel habitats for an endangered mammal in a peri-urban landscape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.04.022 |
| Authors |
Sarah J. Maclagan, Terry Coates, Euan G. Ritchie |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 27% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 36 | 32% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 28% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 69. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#628,160
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#509
of 6,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,539
of 342,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#19
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.