You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
No Detection of XMRV in Blood Samples and Tissue Sections from Prostate Cancer Patients in Northern Europe
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0025592 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kristin Stieler, Sarah Schindler, Thorsten Schlomm, Oliver Hohn, Norbert Bannert, Ronald Simon, Sarah Minner, Michael Schindler, Nicole Fischer |
Abstract |
We recently published the rare detection of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) (1/105) in prostate cancer (PCA) tissue of patients in Northern Europe by PCR. The controversial discussion about the virus being detected in PCA tissue, blood samples from patients suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), as well as from a significant number of healthy controls prompted us to deepen our studies about detection of XMRV infection applying different detection methods (PCR, cocultivation and immunohistochemistry [IHC]). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
Psychology | 2 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2011.
All research outputs
#6,689,351
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#78,660
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,215
of 135,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#900
of 2,569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.