You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
HIV/AIDS, Food Supplementation and Livelihood Programs in Uganda: A Way Forward?
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0026117 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jessica E. Yager, Suneetha Kadiyala, Sheri D. Weiser |
Abstract |
Over the last decade, health, nutrition and policy experts have become increasingly aware of the many ways in which food insecurity and HIV infection negatively impact and reinforce one another. In response, many organizations providing HIV care began supplying food aid to clients in need. Food supplementation, however, was quickly recognized as an unsustainable and incomplete intervention. Many HIV care organizations therefore developed integrated HIV and livelihood programs (IHLPs) to target the root causes of food insecurity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
South Africa | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 104 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 26 | 25% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 13% |
Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 10% |
Unknown | 28 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2012.
All research outputs
#7,696,936
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#95,023
of 202,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,774
of 137,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,053
of 2,581 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,084 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 137,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,581 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.