You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical safety of 3-T brain magnetic resonance imaging in newborns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Radiology, March 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00247-018-4105-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Monica Fumagalli, Claudia Maria Cinnante, Sonia Francesca Calloni, Gabriele Sorrentino, Ilaria Gorla, Laura Plevani, Nicola Pesenti, Ida Sirgiovanni, Fabio Mosca, Fabio Triulzi |
| Abstract |
The effects and potential hazards of brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 T in newborns are debated. Assess the impact of 3-T MRI in newborns on body temperature and physiological parameters. Forty-nine newborns, born preterm and at term, underwent 3-T brain MRI at term-corrected age. Rectal and skin temperature, oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded before, during and after the scan. A statistically significant increase in skin temperature of 0.6 °C was observed at the end of the MRI scan (P<0.01). There was no significant changes in rectal temperature, heart rate or oxygen saturation. Core temperature, heart rate and oxygen saturation in newborns were not affected by 3-T brain MR scanning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 22% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#12,782,275
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#984
of 2,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,481
of 329,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#22
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,095 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.