↓ Skip to main content

Talk to the Virtual Hands: Self-Animated Avatars Improve Communication in Head-Mounted Display Virtual Environments

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Talk to the Virtual Hands: Self-Animated Avatars Improve Communication in Head-Mounted Display Virtual Environments
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025759
Pubmed ID
Authors

Trevor J. Dodds, Betty J. Mohler, Heinrich H. Bülthoff

Abstract

When we talk to one another face-to-face, body gestures accompany our speech. Motion tracking technology enables us to include body gestures in avatar-mediated communication, by mapping one's movements onto one's own 3D avatar in real time, so the avatar is self-animated. We conducted two experiments to investigate (a) whether head-mounted display virtual reality is useful for researching the influence of body gestures in communication; and (b) whether body gestures are used to help in communicating the meaning of a word. Participants worked in pairs and played a communication game, where one person had to describe the meanings of words to the other.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 107 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 27%
Student > Bachelor 19 16%
Student > Master 17 14%
Researcher 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 19 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 37 31%
Psychology 21 18%
Engineering 13 11%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 22 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#932,461
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,742
of 193,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,136
of 135,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#133
of 2,569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.