You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Monotonic solutions of cooperative games
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Game Theory, June 1985
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01769885 |
| Authors |
H. P. Young |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 29 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 29 | 23% |
| Engineering | 15 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 12 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 22 | 17% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,797,818
of 23,114,117 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Game Theory
#11
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#970
of 10,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Game Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,114,117 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 10,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them