↓ Skip to main content

The Cultural Dynamics of Copycat Suicide

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
79 X users
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
215 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Cultural Dynamics of Copycat Suicide
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex Mesoudi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 215 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
United States 4 2%
Portugal 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 197 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 20%
Researcher 32 15%
Student > Bachelor 29 13%
Student > Master 28 13%
Other 12 6%
Other 39 18%
Unknown 33 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 15%
Social Sciences 31 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 36 17%
Unknown 39 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 118. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#365,022
of 25,859,234 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,161
of 225,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#790
of 108,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#18
of 528 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,859,234 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,506 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 528 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.